Category: Blog


I have been promising this since April, but it looks like it is finally coming to fruition, the dance record is coming together. As I mentioned in this post, I believe the album in its current form, if not dead, is getting close, so instead of waiting for the full thing to be done, I’ll release it in multiple EP’s. Below is a sample that sounds like nothing that will be on the record.

I’ll be honest with you, I went into the studio with a melody in my head and instead of making a dance track I basically started wondering what the capabilities of my new computer were, so I loaded up a bunch of ridiculously large samples and went to town.  The system did not even blink.  Give me a break on some of the rhythms, this is about 90 minutes of work, so it’s not perfect, but I guess if you’re looking for a guy to pay a lot of money to write a score, I could do that too.  I have to admit, doing this was fun, it’s always a fun new challenge to dabble in genres. 

Consider this the song that’s announcing that another release is imminent–this is a pronouncement!

The EP is Coming

 

Just to warn you, this is a post for gearheads. As you may or may not know, I am obsessed with recording gear, and fairly opinionated about what is good. I used to be the biggest Logic apologist until Apple ruined that application by making it too easy, and then discovered that ProTools actually does sound better. Technically, PT sounding better than Logic cannot be supported by any science. If you look at the specs, Logic should sound better–but ask anyone who has worked on PT HD compared with Logic, if their honest, they’ll probably agree PT is better.

This became most poignant for me when I tried to run Logic 7 as the front end of my PT HD using the ESB in Logic. I think I am one of the 19 people in the world who actually got this to work to immediately discover that it was impossible to work in the two environments because Logic and PT sounded so different. To even slightly mix any of the TDM or RTAS instruments in PT required that you EQ’d the crap out of the whole sound to make it mesh with all the muddy sounding stuff coming from the Logic side. I learned PT, and while its MIDI is still wonky, the benefits far outweigh the drawbacks. I have come to the conclusion that many PT haters are simply that, haters.

 

Because I am too lazy to actually write a real blog, I recorded a video blog. These will be appearing with more frequency, however, because I still occasionally enjoy writing, you will see some written blogs in the future.

 

Well, changes are coming. We’ll keep you posted!

 

The idea that the album is dead is nothing new. Most artists living outside the mainstream music scene have been saying this for years–with digital distribution there is no reason for the album in the traditional sense.

First an anecdotal history. Why are albums the way they are? Well, it’s pretty simple, the media always defined it. The LP was introduced in 1948 and due to mastering issues are usually limited to 45 minutes (The format can actually hold more music, but fidelity suffers.). Since most pop and rock songs average at 3-5 minutes, that pretty much means you are limited to 10-12 tracks an album. There are of course exceptions (double disk albums etc.) but for the most part the 10-12 track rule holds true. When Philips developed the CD, they were operating in this paradigm, so the red book standard somewhat mimicked this rule.

Now you may have also assumed that pressing and distributing vinyl and later CD’s isn’t cheap, so it’s in the artist’s and label’s best interest to utilize as much of the medium as possible, therefore, if you are an artist, you don’t release any music until you have enough to fill an album.

There we have it, a primer history of the album. However, as you also may have noticed, fewer and fewer people are actually buying media instead of downloading it. All of the limitations of media and distribution are now gone, so why wait for 10 tracks before releasing your music?

Now some claim the album was done long before digital downloading took over the world, and I somewhat agree–bad albums killed the album. People simply got sick of paying for ten songs when in reality there were maybe two songs worth a listen. Also, singles were often hard to find, and not much cheaper, so people just grudgingly bought the album. Napster changed all that. No longer did people have to blow money on an album for a song, they could just download it. iTunes and similar services just legalized that practice.

I don’t necessarily consider the single centric music world a good thing. The 45-60 minute music experience still is worthwhile, but why does it have to be in the same release? Writing an album is time consuming and that time can destroy any momentum from previous releases, especially for artists that don’t have the machine or super tour supporting their releases. Also, there’s no real reason to wait anymore because indie artists aren’t having to cough up a bunch of money to press vinyl or CD’s, therefore, here comes the staggered release.

Think of it like a miniseries. Instead of releasing a full album at once, release bunches of songs that will make up the full album once the releases are finished. Other times it may be like releasing a short story EP.

Following this paradigm, I am working with some talented people on an album that will be released in two parts. There is currently no name for the project but it is a poppy dance album. None of the deep themes in the previous SDO albums. So far there are about two songs in the can. This should be fun. The goal is to have the first release in April. I will let you know.